 |
Obama says he wants to “change the domestic discourse,” and “result in the people together,” but if yahoo answers in any indication, he inspires a lot of loathing towards him (terrorist, militant sympathizer, communist, racist, etc) and FROM his supporters. (one currently questioned how most bruises Cindy McCain will have nov 5th, and the answers from obama supporters were “LOL,” and “probably a lot.” and BO supporters contstanly job McCain, a flashy fight veterand and POW insane, warmonger, distress from PTSD, incontinence, insanity etc.)
Given Obama has the most magnanimous choosing by casting votes jot down in the parliament and is one of the MOST narrow-minded senators (check factcheck.org) and since Aggravate Reid and Nancy Pelosi are dual of the most mad, narrow-minded leaders in the story of congress, (seriously, they make newt gingrinch demeanour like a tall propagandize superintendence shrink!), here is my question:
how on earth is the domestic sermon starting to shift and the republic come together when you have 3 partisans heading the people, and half the people is gloating and the other half fuming?
how on earth is the domestic sermon starting to shift and the republic come together when you have 3 partisans heading the people, and half the people is gloating and the other half fuming?
Any obama supporters wish to take a gash at it?
Related posts:
- HALEY SPEAKS TO SUPPORTERS AFTER WIN Haley Speaks To Supporters After Win Watch live video as...
- PRESIDENT OBAMA – HOW HE USED SOCIAL MEDIA TO WIN HIS ELECTION We all know how ancestral the 2008 US Elections have...
- BARACK OBAMA 2012 ELECTION SUPPORTERS If you truelly feel that Barack Obama Should Become...
- BRIDGE TO NOWHERE SUPPORTERS REGROUP Bridge to nowhere supporters regroup Associated Press – Jan 24,...
- PALIN ADMONISHES HER OWN SUPPORTERS Supporters at the distant reaches of the assembly gossip...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Hypocrite!
McCain & Palin inspires HATE; hello!
Obama / Biden 08!!!
Also, you forgot people will leave the people, if Obama wins.
Go back to sleep
disparate bush who built an ideological wall around his administration and got rid of people who did not conform(colin powell), obama will brilliant the best men and women for positions in his cabinet, he has a history of working crosswise the isle:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/choice2008/view/
He also wants censorship. That’s been obvious. If you don’t agree with him you must be racist. They want censorship. It’s either their way or no way. It’s no coincidence Obama and his campaign has said nothing against other news networks. Mainly just Fox News. Because they don’t subscribe to his cult mentality of ‘follow the leader’.
If you try to silence someone, you only make them louder and more heard.
I reckon our “Right Patriot’s” answer is exactly what the poster was hinting at =]
What’s the question?
VOTE OBAMA! http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AtJzBH_pCHch3rl6Rcv1k1XHxQt.;_ylv=3?qid=20081027202223AAyBwZC
The first answer just proved your logic right.
I reckon this is an brilliant question… kind of sad that you can’t get a excellent answer for it though
It is nice to reckon about changes. Changes are inevitable.
Nothing excellent can come out of the circumstances that we seem to be heading toward. When the Dems have control of the White House, a larger majority in both houses of Congress, and the possiblity of two more liberal Supreme Court Justices, we are heading for a more serious problem than any of us can know. We need checks and balances for our government to work by the book.
The only hope we have is that Pelosi trips over her lip and breaks her neck. I am going to be an mad white person next Wednesday. I hope life won’t be as terrible as I suspect it will be after Obama and Biden are turned loose on the people….But I honestly hope and pray that Pelosi is NEVER given the keys to the city. She is NUTS!
The pendulum swings. Before elections you have fiercely divided sides…if it weren’t so we would not have enough voters to care. After things cool down, they learn to work together. We only know what the top tells us anyhow. You’ll never know what really goes on at the top unless you are there. If you are free and reasonably pleased in this people (compared to other countries) then just figure it all works out and has been doing so since 1776.
I do belive that it is McCain and his campaing that inspires a lot of hatred towards Obama, by trying to make a case that Senator Obama is a terrorist, terrorist sympathizer, communist, racist, etc…
McCain does so because he cannot run on the issues and polices, he does not have answers, he does not have our intrests… All he cares is trying to make Senator Obama seem un-American.
“how on earth is the political discourse going to change and the nation come together when you have 3 partisans leading the people, and half the people is gloating and the other half fuming?”
We can do this but we must stop the name calling and get to the basics, get to the issues, let them be the focus.
And twice as many people will leave this people if Mc.Cain wins including me!!!!! So if you want to leave when Obama runs the people then so long excellent riddance!!!!
I thnk there’s something very weird in your thinking, in that you seem to be blaming Obama for the people on the other side who are making the partisan attacks on him! He’s life called a socialist and communist and Muslim and everyhing under the sun by the Republicans. What more can he do than not reciprocate? I remember that Clinton went to Congress wanting to reach crosswise the aisle, too, and I remember what the Republicans did to him.
I might add that I disagree that the problem here is having priorities. Ronald Reagan was a radical conservative, yet no one would say he fostered the sort of partisan poison we have today — after work he would play cards with Tip O’Neil. That’s the way Washington used to work. The right position in the legislature is the one that gets carried. Bipartisanship is something different. It means reaching out to get that majority, respecting the rights of the other side, not taking advantage or launching attacks that are purely partisan and political. Disagreeing in a civil fashion. I don’t reckon we have to look far to see how the Republicans have diverged from Reagan in that accept, and what the consequences have been, and I don’t reckon it can possibly be argued that the preternaturally restrained Obama is less likely to reach out to the other side than John McCain, who has run the dirtiest most dishonest presidential campaign in living memory.
He says “we all” .They say terriorist,welfare,treacherous! He doesn’t have black panther signs hung from windows.Disparate McCain rallies people shouting out “off with his head”.And Palins’ rallies having signs “KKK for Palin”,and they inspire people to us sawdawf shotguns targeting innocent children and threatening Obama’s life.That’s Obama’s fault??? Now read this:
1.)How close are McCain and Liddy? At least as close as Obama and Ayers appear to be. In 1998, Liddy’s home was the site of a McCain fundraiser. Over the years, he has made at least four contributions totaling $5,000 to the senator’s campaigns — including $1,000 this year.
Last November, McCain went on his radio show. Liddy greeted him as “an ancient friend,” and McCain sounded like one. “I’m proud of you, I’m proud of your family,” he gushed. “It’s always a pleasure for me to come on your program, Gordon, and congratulations on your continued success and adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation fantastic.”
Bill Ayers’ tumultuous past contrasts with silent academic life
Family ties proved Ayers’ point Which principles would those be? The ones that told Liddy it was fine to break into the office of the Democratic National Committee to sow bugs and photograph documents? The ones that made him propose to kidnap anti-war activists so they couldn’t disrupt the 1972 Republican National Convention? The ones that inspired him to plot the murder (never carried out) of an unfriendly newspaper columnist?
2.)* That Gov. Palin, when a Wasilla city council member, formed an alliance with some of the more radical far-right citizens in Wasilla and vicinity, particularly members of the secessionist Alaskan Independence Party who were allied with local John Birch Society activists. These activists played an vital role in her election as Wasilla mayor in 1996.
* Once mayor, one of Mrs. Palin’s first acts was to attempt to appoint one of these extremists (a man named Steve Stoll) to her own seat on the city council. This was a man with a history of disrupting city council meetings with intimidating behavior. She was blocked by a single city council member.
* Next, Mrs. Palin fired the city’s museum director at the behest of this faction.
* She fomented an ultimately successful effort to derail a piece of local gun-control legislation which would simply have prohibited the open carry of firearms into schools, liquor stores, libraries, courthouses and the like. The people recruited to shout this ordinance down included these same figures, notably the local AIP representative (who became the AIP’s chairman that same year).
* She remained associated politically with the local AIP/Birch faction throughout her tenure as mayor on other issues, particularly a successful effort to amend the Alaska Constitution to prohibit local governments from issuing any local gun-control ordinances.
Do you reckon she and McCain are blowin’ us a political smoke screen trying to hide their own pals!
Obama is not the one inspiring despise. It is because people have their own issues. What you hear now is no different than when Bush was elected or when Clinton was elected. In fact, if you go back, Kennedy vs. Nixon seemed to be one of the most divisive campaigns at that time. It’s basically that we have not improved at all over the years.
People are as opinionated as ever, so as long as people stay this way (ie, closed minded, pejudice), things will not improve. By the way, I assume you would have questioned the same question when Bush was elected either in 2000 or 2004.
If I were to be an optimist, then perhaps it will work out this way. The Republican Party is at such a disarray at the moment that if Obama ends up winning 375 electoral votes, the Republican Party through back-stabbing, finger pointing, and name calling will end up imploding. Those in the Republican Party who simply want a reduced government will end up life so disgusted with the neocons and the religious right, that they will end up leaving the Republican Party (to go to the Democratic Party or some other third party). The Republican Party led by its newest star Sarah Palin will eventually fade into nothingness because the public will realize these type of people are only pushing their own personal agenda and do not know how to govern. Without the neocons and religious right pushing the incorrect buttons, the remaining politcal parties will be able to be more civil discourse and election of officials will be based on issues rather than based on prejudice.
But I’m not much of an optimist when it comes to people improving, so I reckon you’ll see the same type of campaigning in 2012 and prospect elections to come.
Anyhow, if you reckon this election is terrible, you should read the following article:
http://www.cracked.com/article_16680_5-presidential-elections-even-dumber-than-this-one-somehow.html
that does not compute,.