Question by nas_question: is there an instrumental to “black republican” by nas?
the song features Jay Z and the beat has been used by a similar song about the ghetto by Ice Cube and a song called Black Democrat featuring Papoose.
Best answer:
Answer by GEEDER
try this link. it has karaoke versions of songs. maybe you can find it there without the lyrics.
Give your answer to this question below!
Dallas, Texas (PRWEB) March 08, 2012
New Book “2012 for Twentysomethings: A Young Voter’s Guide to the 2012 Elections”(Brown Books Publishing Group) by Salvator J. La Mastra V provides valuable information for the youth vote, who for the most part will determine the outcome of the 2012 presidential election.
In “2012 for Twentysomethings” La Mastra speaks directly to the voters of his generation, laying out the hot issues and each party?s stance on them for the upcoming election.
Unemployment, health care reform, entitlement programs, and taxes are just a few of the many issues he addresses.
?La Mastra?s explanations of these issues will resonate with the young audience, effectively combating the disinterest in current events that results in voter apathy,? says Trenton Garza, president of Baylor Democrats. ?This guide is precisely the resource those organizing the youth vote in 2012 need to achieve such a task.?
?Facing an economy in decline, a bleak job market, and a runaway deficit that threatens their future, the 2012 election is more consequential for young voters than ever before,? says Karl Rove, former senior advisor and deputy chief of staff to President George W. Bush.
Picking a leader at the ballot box can be a difficult choice ? it?s hard to sort out fact from fiction and doublespeak from sincere promises, especially with the bias in today?s media.
Adds Lance Kennedy, former state chairman, Texas College of Republicans, ?As a twentysomething, I know the importance of being politically informed. Sadly, most people my age are ignorant of the issues of our day.?
Dedicated to the reader, “2012 for Twentysomethings” provides the necessary information to help the youth vote make choice decisions when the time comes to cast their presidential vote in 2012.
?’2012 for Twentysomethings’ is a must-read primer for any young adult new to the political process,? says Jonathan Boos, president of the Dallas County Young Republicans. ?La Mastra provides unbiased, nonpartisan information on the issues facing our nation for the 2012 elections.?
To learn more visit: http://www.2012ForTwentysomethings.com
# # #
The Elephant Has Left the Building
Image by Random Factor
Goodbye, Republican majority. Good riddance. May you choke on the money you stole.
On Giuliani
“There are only three things in a Giuliani sentence: ‘a noun and a verb and 9/11.’” (A quote from Senator Biden)
New York Times Columnist Maureen Dowd put it best: “Giuliani needs to stop talking about 9/11 and call 9-1-1 because his Presidential Campaign is in trouble.”
On McCain
Last week, I received a feedback from a former professor (a Ph.D. in Physics) who logically defended John McCain’s political platform. I tremendously respect the said professor (he once wrote a recommendation letter on my behalf) and I hold him in very high esteem. As a matter of fact, I have ‘to dig deep’ to counter the virtuosity of his arguments.
In Physics, we learned that ‘natural laws’ (at least our understanding and knowledge of said laws) are not fixed and not absolute. Like in every academic endeavor: natural and social scientific laws should go through the crucible (debates, investigations, experiments and tests) like true gold based on their respective adamantine foundation of truth and scientific/historical accuracy.
If there should be a discovery of ‘base metal’ after going through the crucible, then the laws should be evolved to reflect ‘the increase of knowledge.’ (Otherwise, we would be guilty of suppressing academic freedom and supporting censorship: which leads to book burning [not publishing sound academic works]; ‘witch-hunting’ ['the litmus test'], and ‘the burning at the stake’ [via economical/physical violence]). For example, Newtonian Physics were evolved by Einsteinian Physics (in particular, The General Theory of Relativity); Einsteinian Physics were evolved by Bohrian Physics (in particular, the Bohr-Einstein debates on Quantum Mechanics), and Bohrian Physics were evolved by Susskindian Physics (in particular, Leonard Susskind’s String Theory).
In McCain, you find a candidate who will not compromise on principle: the principle that war solves everything – war is the ‘unified field theory’ of politics – war is ‘the theory of everything’ in politics.
Perhaps, McCain is a prisoner of his conviction because war is the only thing he knows – as he admitted to Tim Russert on Meet the Press: “I don’t know much about the economy but I’m reading Alan Greenspan’s new book.” What’s in Alan Greenspan’s new book? Here is an excerpt: “The U.S. went to war in Iraq motivated largely by oil.” (Alan Greenspan failed to add the neoconservative’s ideology inspired motive for the Iraq War).
Unlike physicists, McCain’s stubbornness would resist any evolution (via the increase of knowledge) of his stance on war: “Knowing what I know now about the lack of WMDs in Iraq and the lack of Saddam’s connection to 9/11, I still think the Iraq War is justified.” McCain is bound to his misplaced principle like the Neoconservatives is bound to their nefarious ideology and the Vatican was bound to its former dogma: “the sun rotates around a flat earth.”
Let’s borrow from the Torah, wasn’t King Solomon – the wisest, most intelligent and richest man – a man of peace? Let’s borrow from the Bible, isn’t the Antichrist going to conquer the world via the pretext of appearing as a man of peace? Even the Antichrist (Evil Incarnate) knows that ‘peace’ is the way.
Out of principle, I cannot support the candidacy of John McCain. After all, I’m wedded to the principle of ‘change.’
On Romney
“In the U.S., all religions are not created equal.” (coined by yours truly, Karl A. Mitchell)
Besides his Mormonism, Romney has an image problem which he began to address by ‘dressing down’ in Florida. Pat Buchanan summed up my point best: “Romney looks like the Chair of the Country Club who decides on your eligibility for membership or the guy (C.E.O.) who’s handing out the pink slips to the workers in the current recession. He looks like the perfect kid in school whom your mother would persuade you to emulate. “
On Huckabee
“For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul? Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul?” (Matthew 16:26 from the New American Standard Bible [©1995])
In an earlier essay, I commented that Huckabee is divorcing himself from the War Party (a.k.a., Neocons). So much for my optimism, he flipped like a cheap trick (selling his soul, er, himself to the War Party) during the Florida GOP Debates. There was Huckabee comparing the missing WMDs to missing Easter eggs (a paraphrase): “…because Easter eggs cannot be found doesn’t mean they weren’t planted; the WMDs could’ve been moved to Jordan.” Doesn’t he sound like Rumsfeld in one of his notorious ‘Rumsfeld speaks?’ I blame myself because I should’ve followed my head instead of my heart, especially when he misspoke on the geography of Pakistan – worse than George W. Bush not knowing the name of the current leader (Musharraf) of Pakistan when he was quizzed by an interviewer during his first run for the Presidency.
Besides, shouldn’t a self-proclaimed Christian pastor be preaching about ‘the Crucifixion and the Resurrection’ of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, rather than preaching about Pagan inspired Easter Eggs?
On the Good Doctor Ron Paul
“If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have love, I have become a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.” (1Corinthians13:1 from the New American Standard Bible [©1995])
Like the prodigal son, I have returned to Ron Paul’s camp. I’m a believer in his foreign policy.
But, Karl, what about his domestic policy?
Like the above quote, the other candidates (better speakers and better equipped on domestic policy) lost my vote because of their stance on foreign policy. Lest you forget, I argued in an earlier essay (Guns vs. Butter) on the connection between domestic policy (the Economy) and foreign policy (the Iraq War and other neoconservative war crimes, er, misadventures): the U.S. economy is undermined by our misplaced foreign policy.
Very well, Karl, what do you have to say about the good Doctor’s racist background?
Neoconservative rags reported that Ron Paul’s former chief of staff published racist articles in a namesake newspaper/newsletter. Ron Paul’s office maintained that he didn’t have any knowledge of the racist articles that were published by a former disgruntled employee until he was approached by the Media on the matter.
Do you buy his line? In other words, what is the level of your gullibility and naïveté?
Well, I try to live by the code: “to err is human and to forgive is divine.” If we are able to forgive the high ranking Democrat and West Virginia U.S. Senator Robert Carlyle Byrd for his former membership in the Ku Klux Klan (K.K.K.), then we should be able to forgive Ron Paul’s alleged racist misdeeds. What’s more, the Neoconservative media failed to provide the evidence and/or irrefutable arguments connecting Ron Paul to the articles. Let’s think about it, are we able to connect the Clintons to their surrogates’ (both Black and White) race/religious card baiting in their campaign against Obama via indisputable evidence or unassailable arguments? I think not; the jury is still out, so until it is proven otherwise: Dr. Ron Paul, you’re the best of the Republican pack.
Karl A. Mitchell
Article by Gene Lalor
Scratch a liberal often enough and you’ll always uncover a bigot-and a hypocrite.
No less a figure than George Lucas of Star Wars fame has discovered that fact of life and called out Hollywood liberals-if that’s not redundant-for its racism.
Accused of racism himself after the release of Star Wars due to the lack of inclusion of blacks, Lucas should have been prepared for the racial politics that exists in the Movie Capital of the World.
The famous film producer didn’t, couldn’t, express his feelings in those terms since he still has to work in Tinsel Town but he left no doubt what he meant during an appearance on ultra-liberal Jon Stewart’s “Daily Show.”
The subject of Lucas’ charge concerned his film about the segregated Tuskegee Airmen in WWII, Red Tails, and Hollywood’s monumental disinterest in distributing the movie or having anything to do with it because, as he told Stewart, “It’s an all black movie. There’s no major white roles in it at all. It’s one of the first all black action pictures ever made.”
He also described Red Tails as “very patriotic, very jingoistic, very old-fashioned, corny,” which may have been another factor in Hollywood’s refusal to assist Lucas even though he financed the filming on his own.
Bigotry is acceptable in Tinsel Town but they cringe at patriotism there saying, “No. We don’t know how to market a movie like this. . . And they don’t believe there’s any foreign market for it. That’s 60 percent of their profit.”
See a brief clip from the film and Stewart’s sit-down with George Lucas.
In other words, the big wigs wouldn’t distribute Red Tails because it was all about blacks, was patriotic AND, as is typical with “black movies,”didn’t have enough profit potential to stuff their wallets.
Maybe if Lucas’ next effort involves African-Americans bad-mouthing their country, he’d get more support from Hollywood hypocrites.
Hypocrisy-and deception-are rampant in Liberal Land and the current effort to resurrect and refurbish President Barack Hussein Obama’s mentor and pastor of 20 years, Rev. Jeremiah “God Damn America” Wright, is probably the most blatant in Washington.
In the event no one has noticed, 2012 is an election year and the president is in the process of “pulling a Clinton,” that is, ostensibly moving to the middle of the socio-political spectrum, transforming into a “moderate,” in hopes of concealing the extremist changes and dashed hopes of the past three years.
With the economy still a mess, there’s little hope in the White House of restoring any real economic hope before November 6th so rehabilitating Obama’s radical background is one way he can forestall anticipated Republican campaign attacks on his extremist past and his far-out leftist associations.
Obama’s old buddies, the un-reconstructed revolutionary Bill Ayers is as out there as he ever was preaching revolt to the Occupy Wall Street anarchists and Rev. Michael Pfleger has never given up his message of self-hating race hatred.
However, Rev. Wright has been relatively less-incendiary-relatively-since candidate Obama disowned him under pressure in the heat of the last campaign.
Therefore, close presidential adviser and confidante, David Axelrod, figured this was a good a time as any to re-hab the good reverend so that the Republican nominee can’t beat his boss over the head with Wright. Since the mainstream media ably assisted last time around in hiding the intimate Obama-Wright connection, the MSM should be onboard again.
Notwithstanding Wright’s history of denouncing white people as congenital liars, his mindless, vicious allegations that America brought on September 11th, 2001, that we caused the AIDS virus, that America is under the control of the KKK and supports terrorism, plus a slew of other craziness, Axelrod is defending the certifiable racist nut.
Axelrod contends that all the criticism boils down to “ninety seconds of vitriol plucked from thirty years of sermons by some enterprising opposition researcher.”
Either David is smoking what his hero smoked for years, and it’s not cigarettes, or he has evolved into a bigger nutcase than Rev. Wright.
See a video report on Axelrod’s hypocritical historical revisionism.
Unfortunately, we’ve come to expect lies and hypocrisy from politicians but when the hypocritical lies and hypocrisy emanate from PBS we should be positively aghast.
(How’s that for verbal irony?)
The ungrateful King of Calypso, Harry Belafonte, who would have spent his life warbling tunes in Jamaica instead of becoming a warbling pop-fave in America if not for the fact he was educated in the U.S. and knew where the money was, has often ripped the country that saved him from warbling anonymity.
Belafonte departed from that norm on the black racist Tavis Smiley’s PBS show “Smiley and West” co-hosted by the even more rabid white-hater Cornel West.
Maybe attributable to his age-84 at last count and he had recently fallen asleep on-air during a television interview-Belafonte went far afield of the racist-leftist reservation when he actually criticized The Anointed One.
Well, yes and no. Belafonte criticized and PBS exorcized his negative critique.
Smiley had recently been disinvited from speaking at the White House MLK festivities for voicing his disenchantment with the president for not doing enough for African-Americans so he, and PBS, had some fence-mending to do.
Therefore, when Belafonte indicated he didn’t Obama and doubted his “moral compass,” some damage control was called for. That control was implemented by Belafonte’s remarks being mysteriously edited out before the audio was fed to PBS affiliates and were censored from the transcipt of the show.
“Smiley and West” producers now say the remarks were deleted because they simply weren’t “interesting.”
Most people would consider the comments of a noted, former presidential-supporter turned presidential-critic of great interest but judge for yourself how interesting they are by comparing the original broadcast and the expurgated versions.
“Interesting” must be all in the ear of the listener-and in the hypocritical eye of PBS censors.
A final instance of liberal hypocrisy is barely worth mentioning. However, since it is remarkably laughable, I’ll mention it anyway: MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell, an avid Obama acolyte yet apparently unaware the president is a blithering idiot absent his teleprompter, ridiculed Mitt Romney’s use of a teleprompter.
Enough said.(See all sources at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=12135.)
Question by Iron_Plague: Obama threatens Republicans in Congress “unite behind his jobs bill or get ready to be run out of town”?
Yet, he cannot even get his lackeys in the Senate to pass it. So, why is it the fault of Republicans? Why are they the ones that he is threatening?
It seems to me that if he is going to suddenly try to be Mr. Tough Guy, he would hold his own comrades to task too.
Is this just more hypocrisy from the left?
Are the American sheeple going to fall for it?
What are your thoughts?
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-gop-act-jobs-run-town-214227327.html
Best answer:
Answer by Tortureking
OBAMA GAVE THE GOP CONGRESS 10 PACES
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
New York, N.Y. (PRWEB) January 11, 2012
Marvin Olasky, journalist, author and educator will lead the World Journalism Institute?s team of instructors for its 2012 New York City journalism course.
Dr. Olasky has degrees from Yale University and University of Michigan. He is the editor-in-chief of WORLD magazine. In 1992 he wrote The Tragedy of American Compassion which Speaker Newt Gingrich famously gave to every Republican in the House of Representatives. President George W. Bush called Olasky ?compassionate conservatism’s leading thinker? as a result of The Tragedy.
The eight-week New York course in May and June of 2012, is comprised of a three-week residency in New York City followed by a summer reporting component in students? hometowns. The course will help students gain or hone the skills needed to be reporters with newspapers, websites, radio, or the World News Group. The course will have a strong emphasis on reporting and writing, along with training in radio, photography, and video. The most promising students will receive an internship stipend for use in the World News Group or with other media organizations.
The instructors for 2012 will include Russell Pulliam (Indianapolis Star), Clayton Sizemore (CNN), Les Sillars (Patrick Henry College), Alicia Hansen (NYC Salt), and Mindy Belz and Lee Pitts from WORLD. The course costs $ 500. The residency component will be on the campus of The King?s College, located in the Empire State Building.
The World Journalism Institute is a division of the World New Group with the mission to recruit, equip, place and encourage Christian journalists in the newsrooms of America and the world.
The World News Group also includes WORLD magazine, World Radio, five news websites, and six news magazines for children from pre-K to high school.
To apply for the course, go to http://www.worldji.com, and complete the online application.
###
Question by dee: Do you ever wonder why republicans “plant” 1,2 or 3 minorities behind them when they are doing “big” speeches?
Why are republicans fooling themselves, when most of america already know they are for “some of” the people and not “all” the people.
Best answer:
Answer by inkandflowers
I’m black and I would proudly stand behind a republican doing a speech. You couldn’t pay me enough to stand behind Obama at one of his.
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
Worthington, OH (PRWEB) November 16, 2011
The majority of Registered Voters (58.0%) don?t think a two-party system still effectively represents Americans, according to the latest American Pulse? Survey of 6,136 respondents. 69.0% of Registered Independents, 53.7% of Democrats and 51.2% of Republicans agree. Further, half of Registered Voters would consider voting for a third-party candidate in the 2012 Presidential Election, if a new party is formed:
?If a third party were formed, would you consider voting for its candidate in the 2012 Presidential Election??
Registered Voters
Yes: 55.5%
No: 13.0%
I don?t know: 31.5%
Registered Republicans
Yes: 54.7%
No: 14.0%
I don?t know: 31.3%
Registered Democrats
Yes: 48.2%
No: 18.3%
I don?t know: 33.5%
Registered Independents
Yes: 64.6%
No: 6.6%
I don?t know: 28.8%
Source: American Pulse? Survey, November-2011
Independents are the most likely to consider voting for a presidential candidate from a new party while Democrats are less likely. 3 in 10 Voters are unsure about a third-party candidate in 2012.
For a full, complimentary report, click here.
Voters? interest in the formation of a third party likely stems from their dissatisfaction with the current two-party system. 72.2% say the political parties have grown so far apart that they no longer work. 77.4% of Independents agree, along with 72.9% of Democrats and 67.2% of Republicans.
The majority of voters from each party also say now is the time for a third party to emerge: 67.2% of all Voters think it?s time for a third political party that focuses more on what people think rather than on Washington politics as usual. 75.6% of Independents feel the same, as well as 64.0% of Republicans and 62.7% of Democrats.
Other Key Findings among Voters:
Article by Gene Lalor
Log Cabin Republicans, a splinter group of homosexual alleged Republicans, remind me of minorities who moved into an exclusively majority neighborhood not because they liked the area or a particular house but for the express purpose of causing a ruckus and gaining publicity for their cause.
It was a tactic used by civil rights activists as well as by unethical realtors who used “blockbusting” to drive prices down and drive majorities out of neighborhoods so they could make a killing.
Such agitators were fairly frequent back in the old days when racial agitation was more commonly employed to achieve the goals of the civil rights movement. In 2009, the bulk of those goals have been achieved, except in the minds of extremists and professional troublemakers who thrive on discord.
Today, except in very rare circumstances, most forms of blockbusting don’t occur. With all the laws on the books regarding racial discrimination, it’s largely unnecessary and a blockbusting realtor could find himself in the hoosegow, bunking with one of those minorities he manipulated to make his killings.
Leroy Tyrone Abdul would probably teach that realtor the meaning of Black Power.
Racial times have changed, whether for the better or worse only the future will tell, but times for the gay Log Cabineers haven’t changed an iota. I once wondered why they advertised themselves as Republicans since there is precious little in national Republican Party platforms that would attract the attention of homosexuals.
They derive their corporate name from Abe Lincoln’s log cabin roots at the same time their name is homosexually suggestive.
Okay, as their website, http://online.logcabin.org/about/, states, they say they believe in “limited government, strong national defense, free markets, low taxes, personal responsibility, and individual liberty,” as traditional Republicans do. They are working to return the party to its “core principles.” However, any number of Republican principles are in direct opposition to their core.
Their site goes on to state that now the “GOP has another chance to choose fairness over discrimination, equality over bigotry, hope over fear, and freedom over oppression…. regardless of sexual orientation.”
All nice rhetoric, all predicated on false premises, and all concealing their true purposes, namely to subvert the Grand Old Party and enlist it on the gay side.
Fat chance, at least for true Republicans.
Indicative of how well gays have succeeded in browbeating American society, and the Republican Party, in 2009 is that a search for “gays” and “homosexuals” on GOP.com, http://www.gop.com/splashpage/index.aspx, turns up zero references for the latter and all of three for the former.
Clinton’s military’s “Don’t ask, don’t tell” dictum has become the “We dare not even mention them” Republican position for fear of attack by the forces of the powerful gay lobby.
President George W. Bush and Republican “moderates” soundly trashed the long-established limited government precept and Log Cabin Republicans clearly interpret personal responsibilities and individual liberties far differently than most Republicans. Perhaps they misinterpret avoidance of the topic of gays as agreement on gay core “principles.”
The GOP hasn’t, yet, caved to homosexual opportunings. The leadership simply hasn’t the testicular fortitude to tell them where to stick their “principles” in a less than brilliant strategy to capture a few of the 20,000 Log Cabin votes out of the approximately 120,000,000 that will be cast in the next national election.
Evidence of the differing interpretations of can not necessarily be found on the Log Cabin Republican website which is a study in objective obfuscation.
Evidence of gay values was definitely found on the streets of Chicago during last month’s Gay Pride Parade where Log Cabin Republicans strutted their stuff.
The following video is disturbing in many ways, chief of which is that it shows kids, some as young as five or so, participating in a gay pride parade featuring nudity, exhibitionism, and signs reading, “Big Dicks, Small Government” and “A Strong Military Shoots Big Loads.”
WARNING! The video is crude, repulsive- and emblematic of who and what Log Cabin Republicans truly are. Incidentally, the Chicago cops on duty ignored various violations of Illinois and Chicago laws proscribing public nudity and nuisances, further testimony to the power of the gay lobby: http://americansfortruth.com/issues/youth-and-schools
Sorry, Log Cabineers, nothing in that parade is representative of Republican values or, indeed, of the values of the mass majority of Americans.
I have figured out the intent and purposes of the existence of “Log Cabin Republicans.” Those intentions reflect the aims of all homosexual demonstrations and they do not incorporate merely showing off their feather boas or bulbous breasts.
The purpose, hardly pure but simple, is recruitment.
Homosexuals are well aware that 98% of this country consists of normal heteros and a large percentage of those see homosexuality as an aberration. An even larger percentage don’t want their kids anywhere near gays.
We normals just want to live our normal lives. We don’t want homosexuals, even ostensibly Republican log cabineers, corrupting our kids and grandkids.
Suggestion to Log Cabin Republicans: Join the Democrat Party! They love your ilk over there. We don’t take kindly to blockbusters or perverts. You may have moved into our neighborhoods but that doesn’t make you normal.
| Copyright © 2011 Centralpolitics.com. All Rights reserved. Designated brands and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. | Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha |