Sponsored By

Question by DeeDee Cortez: “Right” to protest? Maybe. Right to be heard? No.?
Protestors like the “RNC Welcoming Committee,” who describe themselves as an “anarchist / anti-authoritarian group,” are already lining up to disrupt, err, make sure their voices are heard at, next year’s Republican National Convention in Minneapolis. (I wonder if they’re planning to protest at the Democratic National Convention in Denver, as well. The Democrats took over Congress in 2004 on a platform to end the Iraq conflict and have thus far not done so, alienating even their left-most member, Cindy Sheehan, as well as most of America: the current Congress’ approval rating is lower than the President’s and the lowest in our history.)
Anyway, what right do they really have to foist their self-importance on everyone? Isn’t this notion the root of problems like shooting in Finland? This whole “look at me; I demand the President see me; hear me; I am important. The world revolves around my opinion. I know it all; know my frustration, it matters more than yours; yes I asked Senator Kerry my question but I won’t leave because I have a right to hold the whole meeting hostage so don’t taz me, bro!”

C’mon, there are six billion people in this world, why has society given some of them the notion that the world revolves around them?

Best answer:

Answer by CHARITY G
The fact that you have to ask what right they have . . . it’s scary.

Give your answer to this question below!

6 Responses to ““Right” to protest? Maybe. Right to be heard? No.?”

  1. That’s life.

  2. Hitler had free speech, but his people didn’t, the Islamic leaders have freedom of religion, it’s their people who don’t, China has the freedom of guns – if you are “elite”
    Any time the rights of one person or one group is protected above an others right, overall freedom and liberty declines.
    People like the RNC Welcoming Committee are dedicated to the destruction of liberty, and their weapon of choice IS liberty.
    We have allowed the first amendment to become so liberalized that now it is beginning to destroy the other rights – such as the right to assemble without violence.
    These people should be taken seriously as a threat to our freedom as a nation, because while they may not be toting guns, their over -extension of their rights are robbing the rest of us of ours.

  3. do we have the right to protest still in America ?

    I thought that had been done away with.

  4. Sadly, too many people think that just because they have a ‘right’ to do something – this exempts them from things like consideration of others and common courtesy.

    Those folks would scream about ‘repression’ if we protested at one of their events.

  5. People don’t realize that with their “right of free speech” to say whatever they want, also comes the “right to ignore them” enjoyed by everyone else.

    Which is precisely why leftist political groups always try to silence their opposition. Their own doctrine and propaganda makes little common sense and they don’t want the opposite point of view to be heard. They cannot win the battle of ideas and must resort to name-calling and attempts to denigrate those that disagree with them. Disagree with a liberal and you will soon be labeled as a “racist” or “homophobe” or “extreme right-wing bigot” just for examples.

    Also, look at the Democrats efforts to renew the “fairness doctrine” of the FCC. Or the global warming freaks to silence anyone who “disagrees” with their agenda.

  6. (Yes, there are plans to protest the DNC as well as the RNC. Thanks for asking.)

    You are forgetting that the Republicans are already violating the rights of the protestors, along with everyone else. Disrupting a criminal organization that is violating your rights in order to prevent them from doing so does not violate anyone’s rights.

    Good luck to the RNC Welcoming Committee.

    *****

    There is a great deal of misunderstanding of the nature
    of anarchism.

    Anarchists (also known as libertarians or libertarian
    socialists, in the original sense of socialism as worker-
    ownership-and-control of the means of production)
    oppose illegitimate authority and hierarchy, and therefore
    oppose capitalism and the state; anarchists do not oppose
    all organization: anarchists favor voluntary, non-
    hierarchical, self-organization. Anarchists do not oppose
    all rules and laws; anarchists oppose rules and laws
    imposed involuntarily by illegitimate authorities, such
    as the state, and favor voluntarily-agreed upon rules and
    laws.

    “Anarchy 101″, an excellent introduction to anarchism,
    can be found here:
    http://tinyurl.com/2fq4d2

    “An Anarchist FAQ”, giving an in-depth treatment of
    anarchism, can be found here:
    http://www.anarchistfaq.org/

    News & Views for Anarchists & Activists:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo/

Copyright © 2011 Centralpolitics.com. All Rights reserved. Designated brands and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha