Article by James W.Smith

John Edwards’ campaign slogan is that there are two America’s. The reality for John Edwards is that there are two Democratic parties, the party of Hillary Clinton and everyone else. Unfortunately forJohn Edwards, his campaign was running well behind Hillary Clinton in all the public opinion polls.

Barack Obama is running the campaign of hope. He was suppose to be the candidate of change. Somehow throughout 2007, Obama has allowed Hillary Clinton to be the candidate with the most political experience and the candidate that best represented change in Washington D.C. This failed strategy, were it to continue, would offer no hope for the Obama campaign.

This was the desperate state of the Edwards and Obama campaigns as both trailed far behind Hillary Clinton in public opinion polls as they entered the debate of Tuesday, October 30, 2007. With two months until the first primary vote is cast, it had become now or never for the Edwards and Obama campaigns.

Indeed, it turned out to be open season on the frontrunner in the debate. Hillary Clinton withstood attacks from the six men on the debate podium for over an hour. She would later refer to the experience as “pile on”. She is the first major party female candidate for President. Therefore, it is unknown how the image of six men verbally attacking one woman on stage relentlessly will be considered by the electorate. However, Mrs. Clinton should certainly be helped among female voters where she is currently drawing much of her strength.

Late in the debate, Mrs. Clinton made the first significant mistakes of her campaign. She has been parsing her position on some issues for months. In this debate, her issue waffling caught up with her on the prospect of giving drivers licenses to illegal immigrants. She was asked about New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer’s plan to offer driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants. Clinton tried to demonstrate empathy for the governor’s predicament, but did not specifically endorse his position. She seemed to be trying to have it both ways. Of course, Hillary Clinton is aware of the public opinion polls which show that giving drivers licenses to illegal immigrants is very unpopular with American public.

As with the question concerning torture for terrorists in the September debate, her less than clear debate answer on drivers licenses for illegal immigrants put her in conflict with an answer she gave in a newspaper interview. She is on record as clearly endorsing the Spitzer position in an interview with the New York Times on 10/18/2007.

Edwards and Obama jumped on her unclear answer as proof of the kind of double talk they’d been accusing her of all night. “America is looking for a president who will say the same thing, who will be consistent, who will be straight with them,” Mr. Edwards said.

Her next mistake occurred when Tim Russert asked Clinton about whether she would expedite the release of her records from her husband’s Presidential term in office, and she gave a long, pondering, and frustrating answer about the slow archival process. She was intimating that the slow, pondering, bureaucracy was the problem until Tim Russert pointed out that her husband signed a letter to withhold release of the documents until 2012.

Obama seized the moment to continue the assault on her candor. “Not releasing… these records at the same time, Hillary, as you’re making the claim that this is the basis for your experience, I think, is a problem. Part of what we need to do is rebuild trust in our government again. And that means being open and transparent to the American people.” He noted that Republicans are “very comfortable” with renewing the partisan fights of the past decades. “And what we don’t need,” he said, “is another eight years of bickering.”

The issue of the release of Hillary Clinton’s White House records is an issue both Obama and Edwards can use effectively in the campaign in the next two months. We have not heard the last of this issue. The drivers licenses for illegal immigrants issue is sure to trouble the Clinton campaign in the 2008 Presidential election against the Republican candidate.

The Democratic campaign has entered it final two months before an accelerated state primary voting calendar begins. Edwards and Obama have now shown that they are not just in a race to be Hillary Clinton’s Vice Presidential choice. Both are still campaigning to win the nomination. The Democrats’ primary election campaign over the next two months should be interesting to watch.

Was this debate a “pile on” by the Democrats as stated by Hillary Clinton or a Clinton “waffle” on several issues as stated both by Barack Obama and John Edwards? The answer is clear. It was both.

James William Smith has worked in senior management positions for some of the largest financial services firms in the United States for the last twenty five years. He has also provided business consulting support for insurance organizations and start up businesses. Mr. Smith has a Bachelor of Science Degree from Boston College. He enjoys writing articles on political, national, and world events. Visit his website at http://www.eworldvu.com










Question by Parker of National Treasure mov: US Senator Kerry said at the Presidential Debate, “The people deserve the Truth?”?
Fine; I am the man who caused him to say that by sending my rough draft book. But do you all no the “Truth”?

Best answer:

Answer by PD
The truth as defined by whom?

Give your answer to this question below!

www.RonPaul.com -Please like, share, subscribe & comment! 2 Ron Paul is America’s leading voice for limited, constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, sound money, and a pro-America foreign policy. To spread the message, visit and promote the following websites: www.RonPaul.com http www.RonPaul2012.com http www.RonPaulCountry.com http www.DailyPaul.com http www.RonPaulFlix.com

In case you missed it. Here’s my recap of the GOP Debate. This election I am not going to vote by my party. I am going to learn about each candidate and make an informed choice.


San Francisco, CA (PRWEB) January 06, 2012

On Tuesday, January 10, FORA.tv, the leading online destination for video programs from the world?s best conferences and events, will broadcast the first debate of the Intelligence Squared U.S. (IQ2US) 2012 season. Hailed as America?s premier debate series, Intelligence Squared U.S. will present five engaging events this spring and will kick of the season with a look at one of the world?s most protracted political conflicts: the volatile relationship between Israel and Palestine, and specifically whether the U.N. should admit Palestine as a full member state. After 20 years of failed talks with Israel, can the recent plea by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to the U.N. really serve as an effective way to create a two-state solution? Or is Palestine setting the peace process back by bypassing negotiations?

FORA.tv will live stream the debate from the NYU Skirball Center in New York starting at 6:45pm ET (3:45pm PT) on Tuesday, Jan. 10. The free live online event can be viewed at intelligencesquaredus.fora.tv. Following the live event, FORA.tv will offer the debate as a free on-demand program.

In support of the motion:

Mustafa Barghouthi, Former Palestinian National Authority Presidential Candidate

Daniel Levy, Former Israeli Government Negotiator & J Street Co-Founder

Against the motion:

Aaron David Miller, Former U.S. Mideast Negotiator, and advisor of Republican and Democratic Secretaries of State

Dore Gold, former Israel Ambassador to the United Nations

The Moderator: John Donvan is a correspondent for ABC News? ?Nightline.? In a career that spans more than two decades for ABC News, Donvan previously served as the Chief White House Correspondent, along with postings in Moscow, London, Jerusalem and Amman.

Throughout the spring FORA.tv will live stream four additional IQ2US debates, which will consider the government?s role in managing obesity (2/7/12); whether China is better at capitalism than the U.S. (3/13/12); the impact of the Internet on politics (4/17/12); and if college football should be banned (5/8/12).

ABOUT FORA.tv

FORA.tv is the leading online destination for video programs from the world’s best conferences and events. With more than 10,000 free and fee-based videos and its iPad ?Conference Channel? app, FORA.tv has the web’s largest collection of programs that feature the people, issues, and ideas changing the world. FORA.tv helps hundreds of organizations including the Aspen Institute, the Economist, the New York Public Library, and Wired expand the audience for their events. FORA.tv has been named a Top 50 Web Site by TIME, and a Top Education Site by The Telegraph. FORA.tv is funded by a select group of investors led by William R. Hearst III and is based in San Francisco. For more information, visit http://fora.tv.

ABOUT INTELLIGENCE SQUARED U.S. DEBATES (IQ2US)

Rethink your point of view with Intelligence Squared U.S. (IQ2US), Oxford-style debates live from New York City. Based on the highly successful debate program based in London, Intelligence Squared U.S. has presented over 50 debates on a wide range of provocative and timely topics. From global warming and the financial crisis, to Afghanistan/Pakistan and the death of mainstream media, Intelligence Squared U.S. brings together the world?s leading authorities on the day?s most important issues. Since its inception in 2006, the goals of The Intelligence Squared U.S. Foundation have been to provide a new forum for intelligent discussion, grounded in facts and informed by reasoned analysis; to transcend the toxically emotional and the reflexively ideological; and to encourage recognition that the opposing side has intellectually respectable views. Visit http://www.iq2us.org for more information.

# # #





Question by : Did Rick Santorum really call Jon Huntsman and Ron Paul “isolationists” in the MSNBC Debate?
Okay. Maybe I can understand why he called Ron Paul, but Huntsman. Just because he disagreed with the Libyan intervention? That makes him an isolationist? Damn. Repubs are damn stupid!

Best answer:

Answer by BlackSunshine84
He did, but I don’t consider having mutually beneficial trade agreements with nations while staying out of their politics to be isolationist.

Did I say there was? That is Ron Paul’s foreign policy, not what we have currently.

What do you think? Answer below!

Question by rob: How do you say “Vice presidential debate” in Spanish?
please help me out

Best answer:

Answer by deka
debate vicepresidencial

Give your answer to this question below!

Article by James W. Smith

President George Bush has declared her the eventual Democratic Party nominee in the 2008 Presidential Election. The public opinion polls in New Hampshire have her leading the rest of the Democratic Party field by twenty percentage points in the State. She has not experienced any further fallout from her campaign’s strange involvement with Norman Hsu. She still leads all Democrats nationwide by eighteen points according to the latest Rasmussen daily tracking poll.

So what did desperate Democratic candidates do to prepare for an event like the debate at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire on September 26, 2007? The only thing that they could do to stay alive in a race that still has three months before the first vote is cast. They joined forces on the clear leader in the polls, Hillary Clinton, and attacked. After months of question and answer sessions that pass for debates in the Democratic party, the debate last evening was the first real live evidence of what the polls have been indicating for months. The rest of the field of Democratic candidates is getting desperate in their attempt to stop Hillary Clinton from claiming the 2008 Presidential election nomination of the Democratic Party. Time is beginning to run out for them, and her large lead in the polls has been very consistent throughout 2007.

The debate did nothing to change the overall trend in the campaign, but it did cause the Hillary Clinton campaign some problems. The biggest problem seemed to be a question that moderator, Tim Russert, asked the Senator from New York. He asked whether there should be a presidential exception to allow the torture of a terror leader if authorities knew a bomb was about to go off, but didn’t know where it was. Mrs. Clinton replied about torture ” It cannot be American policy, period.” Russert revealed that ex President Bill Clinton advocated such a policy on a recent “Meet the Press” appearance. Mrs. Clinton replied “Well, I’ll talk to him later”. The problem for Mrs. Clinton is her interview last fall with the Daily News: In the interview when asked the same question, she said, “In the event we were ever confronted with having to interrogate a detainee with knowledge of an imminent threat to millions of Americans, then the decision to depart from standard international practices must be made by the President, and the President must be held accountable.” Her campaign has not yet responded to questions about that contradiction.

The Democrats were also aware of a new Lake Research Poll which found that Republican Rudy Giuliani leads Mrs. Clinton by 49 per cent to 39 per cent in the swing districts in a 2008 Presidential Election match-up. The poll also found that Mrs. Clinton, in particular, could damage the chances of congressional Democratic candidates on the ballot. The Senator and former First Lady continues to try to walk a fine line. She has to strike a delicate balance between being liberal enough to continue to appeal to the anti-war Democratic primary voter, with the need to be moderate enough for the consideration of the independent voter on which a general election will turn.

With the new polling data in mind, Democratic candidates were questioning whether Hillary Clinton was too polarizing to build national consensus on issues. Her proposed healthcare system overhaul in 1993, which ended in failure, was a topic throughout the evening. She also was attacked by Democratic candidates for voting for a U.S. Senate Resolution urging the State Department to deem part of the Iranian military a terrorist organization. John Edwards tied this to her vote to authorize the Iraq war.

The debate showed the desperation of the field of Democratic candidates. They know that they are badly trailing Hillary Clinton in the race for the party’s nomination. Hillary Clinton’s performance was not one of her best. However, it appears that this debate will not significantly change the minds of many voters.

James William Smith has worked in senior management positions for some of the largest financial services firms in the United States for the last twenty five years. He has also provided business consulting support for insurance organizations and start up businesses. Mr. Smith has a Bachelor of Science Degree from Boston College. He enjoys writing articles on political, national, and world events. Visit his website at http://www.eworldvu.com










Article by Alta

With Election Day about three weeks away, we’re getting close to finding jordan shoes out just how much force the tea party movement has had on this year’s angry electorate. Sparked partly in response to the ballooning federal deficit and the debate over health care reform, the movement is attracting significant attention this election season. Tea party-backed candidates around the country have seen some big primary victories – like Christine O’Donnell in Delaware, Joe Miller in Alaska and Rand Paul in Kentucky, all of whom knocked out U.S. Senate primary opponents who were considered the Republican Party’s establishment candidates.

The same is true in Colorado, where Senate candidate Ken Buck beat the GOP’s early air jordan retro favorite, former state Lt. Gov. Jane Norton, in the Aug. 10 primary. Tonight Buck will face current Sen. Michael Bennet, his Democratic opponent, in a debate hosted by The Denver Post. Bennet was appointed to replace Ken Salazar when President Obama tapped Salazar to be interior secretary. Neither Buck nor Bennet has run for congressional office before.

As some Republicans worry tea party candidates might be too risky for the mainstream, both parties’ national organizations are pouring significant resources into the race. Buck and Bennet have already sparred in a few debates and have a few more to go after tonight.Buck’s rise is one example of the tea party’s power, and Ask America, the Yahoo!

News informal polling forum, has been asking people what they think about the movement. A New York Times/CBS News poll conducted last month found that 23 percent of registered voters view the tea party favorably, 29 percent unfavorably. Nearly half said they are undecided or don’t know enough about the movement yet. Whether or not Ask America users like the tea party, a clear majority says it’s here to stay. Of 7,755 responses to a question asking whether the movement is a passing storm, 64 percent said they think it’ll stick around.

Yahoo! user Andy commented, “The Tea Party protests themselves are a fad, but the political relevance of the Tea Parties is here to stay.” User David Hull, commenting in the column that shows 36 percent think the movement will fade away, said, “I think that it is nothing more than a passing storm. Not the first time either, remember Ross Perot?”Ask America has also collected people’s thoughts on the level of political bickering today that’s represented in part by the tea party’s hard lines on issues like health care and that comes out in its main catchphrase, “Take our country back!” Of nearly 5,500 responses, 76 percent say the level of bickering is unnatural this election cycle.

Ask America has also collected people’s thoughts on the level of political bickering today that’s represented in part by the tea party’s hard lines on issues like health care and that comes out in its main catchphrase,










Note: A typo in one of the titles on this video says 2009 rather than 2010 – sorry. The issue of gun rights arose in the Republican pre-primary debates of May 2010 for the California governorship and the US Senate seat held by Sen. Barbara Boxer. In the US Senate race, the issue of gun rights for individuals on the federal no-fly list arose. In the gubernatorial race, the issue of a propose limit on “open carry” rights arose. In this clip we see the gun-related sections of both debates. US Senate candidates were Tom Campbell, Chuck DeVore, and Carly Fiorina. Gubernatorial candidates are Steve Poizner and Meg Whitman. Note: The Democratic side in both races had essentially no contests so there were no debates.
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Copyright © 2011 Centralpolitics.com. All Rights reserved. Designated brands and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha